Part 1 of 3: On Dinos still blaming Third Party processes for 'Stolen' election of 2000:
Some cursory, if not one's best, the most honest, thoughts on the subject. Simply, Nader being said to be responsible for Gore's folding like a good corporate prince boyscout, isn't 100 % inaccurate; but, it's going on it. The reality of the remocrats hacking elections in the pre-widely used computer and social media age isn't propagated much, because it was a valve by which the corporate structure's convolution's devolutionary direction's agency found itself rooted. There, in the supposed grey area of remocrats: dead, hospitalized, out of country, more than once, voting; notsily: repressing, suppressing, gerrymandering, limiting, buying, poll taxing, disenfranchising, destroying, murdering, voters, that held sway before the utter propagation of la machine, the computer and it's internet (Gore's said to have "invented the internet", I don't know about that, but, I invented Gore, so ...(ha, ha, ha)), highway through humanity's brain (where the extinction of humanity's determined reality was birthed); the dempublican's, only dabblers, corporate legitimacy and agency did also exist. For, the related supposed political art of the dems vs. the science of it of the rems, was most notably seen in their public presumption of innocence, their plausible deniability and the supposedly optimistic projections of people being good, at least inside; in a word, liberalism. Yet, behind that paper thin mask was always the fact that even though their corporate agency didn't trounce their real allegiance to country, constitution, like in the case of the rems and their 'fake' patriotism (which could be equatable with materialism if that generic non-existent entity was actually evil, and it is not), it did trounce the evolutionary growth of the democratic processes advancement in this republic; albeit in an underlying fashion, extended over time. This, 'have it like that', purported capitalistic 'I', 'we', was most evident in the dems great fiascos of the decades leading up to the rems 'stealing' of the election in 2000, and thereby supposedly garnering the expected peace dividend and possiblity of humanity living, away from the people and dems.... Cont'd in next comment:
Part 2 of 3: Can we simply say McGovern, Dukakis, etc., without mentioning Ted Kennedy's, the lion of the Senate, hubris filled run against one of our country's best Presidents, Jimmy Carter, which gave the election to Reagan, straight through to Barack Obama's making agreements with the rems in advance, like not having Hillary as his running mate, etc., I think not? Yet, the purposeful non-prevention of anything through to everything, that has been one of the cornerstones of the corporate structure's supposedly garnering the extinction of humanity (in order to steal all it's stuff), at first a less obvious way of stealing tax $, or at least funneling it through to rems and dinos, was practiced much more insidiously than just that. You have countless examples, not just politicians pathological lying to get their way (more), like Bush, Sr., saying before the election, "read my lips, no new taxes (tax increases)", and directly after winning, raising people's taxes, there's S+L-gate (dems getting $ 95,000 in pay-offs to 3 politicians supposedly stopping the dems from prosecuting, or even holding the rems politically acccountable for going on half a trillion $ theft of the taxpayer), October Surprise, Iran/Contra-gate, the original computer start-up bubble then burst, Y2K, Grenada unnecessary war (allowed by the dems, which set the precedent, for, supposedly legitimizing, the rems future ones), etc.. So, even though Gore 'got away with' not sending dems to counter the rem thuggees stopping the recount of the vote in FL, and boyscout saluting the process of dems demuring to rems, as a lesson to the people for not giving them their projected 'have it like that' as the 'official' (and only, according to the corporate structure's dictated duopolistic (deux party) oligarchic plutocracy) opposition to the rems, he still can't be excused from his vital role in losing the election he should have won to Bush, Jr.. Yet, you place Nader in the nadir of humanity's fall at the point of it's needed resurrection? This while the RalphiNader did have a strategy that was constructed to get dem votes, most of his supporters were struggling to make sure that didn't interupt Gore's victory; specifically, and especially, by universally getting out the vote, inspiring voters to vote, and promoting the electoral processes that the supposed left, the totalitarian/socialist conspiracy, was universally struggling against- for, according to them, direct actions, demonstrations "were the only way" of making real change possible (see how well those historic lies worked in their 'anti-war' efforts?). Yet, as usual, the 'carrot and stick' strategy that you must be in support of above, where the dems don't win 'to teach the polity a lesson for next time', isn't even mentioned above (in all probability); nor it's existence ever acknowledged- why?... Cont'd in next comment:
Part 3a of 3b: That being said, Gore still won 1 million more votes than Bush, jr.. Yet, that's not the most salient thing either, in our country's fall to republicanism, which the tea party was just the unnatural (ebony and ivory, the Black and white supremacies, machined it, in perfect harmony, into existence to further divide, conquer, the people and vampirize through to cannibalize the economy, tax $) progression of, the next notsee step in the continual increasing of the speed of their blitzkrieg of all life and the Earth. The reason would be the dems not effectively countering the continual disenfranchisement of the people of their vote, and rights there of. The biggest example is the flailing, even now, counter-gerrymandering efforts of the dems; allowing that the rems have the whole of the electoral processes gerryrigged against the people and the dems- as well as, of course, the third party movement. This, of course is the dems, tres facile, acquiescence to the oligarchy's corporate structure's rule, through their spearhead, the remocrat conspiracy, extinction and total destruction of the Earth, etc.. So, is it any wonder that the gerryrigging of the voting processes in FL went unchallenged in a timely or meaningful way before the election; so, the establishment of a list that purged voters that falsely said they weren't allowed vote, numbering 95,000, mostly lower-middle-class to poor people of color (who probably would vote dem, if they did)- I think not? King george and his dick, cheney supposed won FL by 232 votes, and then the country, while Gore received a million more votes than him; whereas we know republican thuggeeism and the Supremacy Court installed him. Yet, the dems still are beating the third party processes over the head for the corporate structure's convolution's devolutionary direction's determining that every voter is devolved to one degree or another; are replicants of the rich' decadence, avarice, narcissism, nihilism, etc. (ask any poor person that doesn't even have two nickles to rub together to start a dime, they'll tell you of their dreams, special abilities, powers, vampirism, mutations, etc.)? Yes, the conspiring of Jill Stein and the admin. of the Green Party to install RumputiN/vlad-the-impaler into the Blackhouse (only a part of the global invisible coup that did it, though), for they're socialists and part of the totalitarian conspiracy for more, is a black eye, as well as the most violent act against this country since the purposeful non-prevention of the failing of the levees in NOLA by ebony and ivory, the Black, white supremacies (who, in perfect harmony divided up the federal funds they received for the reinforcing of the levees between themselves), against the third party movement, but, just that, for real greens are nonsocialist; ginos aren't actually greens because you can't abide by the 'ten principles' of the Green Party and be a socialist (as socialists dictate divide and conquer, materialism, "there's no reality without their agreement" ('Chernobyl'), etc., non- green motis operendi that are the same as the rems ones). And so too they define power as on the scale of manipulation through to genocide and extinction like the rems, and non-socialist real greens go in the direction of not materialism, the evolution, instead of the supposed garnering of ever increasing delusional profits, pleasures, powers in ever increasingly cyclical and centralizing patterns of the corporate structure's convolution.... Cont'd in next comment:
Part 3b of 3b: A fine example, destroying the Earth, raping it's mountaintops, cannibalizing it to it's core, makes supposedly increased delusional short term profits in the worldly world while realizing long term real deficiits in reality that are astronomically larger, the extinction of humanity and large mammals as well as the probable total destruction of the Earth; while incidental to the corporate structure's end all and be all, their 'bottom line', it should be the only thing that matters. Like the supposed sciences ending humanity and the Earth in 400 years, that it took the Cosmos, the evolution, 1 billion years to create, in reality; like an instant destroying so much grace, "an insect, so much grain" (Elton John). And yet that 'insect', the religion of scientism, supposed science, is the nexus academic supremacy; how can "...we(e),..." still allow this to unbe humanity? Needless to say, Nader didn't do it, you really have to pick another scapegoat. What we need to remember is that if you didn't vote Hillary, you voted RumputiN/vlad-the-impaler be illegally installed into the Blackhouse. Viva la evolucion. reality
Part 1 of 3: On Dinos still blaming Third Party processes for 'Stolen' election of 2000:
ReplyDeleteSome cursory, if not one's best, the most honest, thoughts on the subject.
Simply, Nader being said to be responsible for Gore's folding like a good
corporate prince boyscout, isn't 100 % inaccurate; but, it's going on it.
The reality of the remocrats hacking elections in the pre-widely used
computer and social media age isn't propagated much, because it was a
valve by which the corporate structure's convolution's devolutionary
direction's agency found itself rooted. There, in the supposed grey area
of remocrats: dead, hospitalized, out of country, more than once, voting;
notsily: repressing, suppressing, gerrymandering, limiting, buying,
poll taxing, disenfranchising, destroying, murdering, voters, that held
sway before the utter propagation of la machine, the computer and it's
internet (Gore's said to have "invented the internet", I don't know
about that, but, I invented Gore, so ...(ha, ha, ha)), highway through
humanity's brain (where the extinction of humanity's determined reality
was birthed); the dempublican's, only dabblers, corporate legitimacy and
agency did also exist. For, the related supposed political art of the
dems vs. the science of it of the rems, was most notably seen in their
public presumption of innocence, their plausible deniability and the
supposedly optimistic projections of people being good, at least inside;
in a word, liberalism. Yet, behind that paper thin mask was always the
fact that even though their corporate agency didn't trounce their real
allegiance to country, constitution, like in the case of the rems and
their 'fake' patriotism (which could be equatable with materialism if
that generic non-existent entity was actually evil, and it is not), it did
trounce the evolutionary growth of the democratic processes advancement
in this republic; albeit in an underlying fashion, extended over time.
This, 'have it like that', purported capitalistic 'I', 'we', was most
evident in the dems great fiascos of the decades leading up to the rems
'stealing' of the election in 2000, and thereby supposedly garnering the
expected peace dividend and possiblity of humanity living, away from
the people and dems.... Cont'd in next comment:
Part 2 of 3: Can we simply say McGovern, Dukakis, etc., without
ReplyDeletementioning Ted Kennedy's, the lion of the Senate, hubris filled run
against one of our country's best Presidents, Jimmy Carter, which gave the
election to Reagan, straight through to Barack Obama's making agreements
with the rems in advance, like not having Hillary as his running mate,
etc., I think not? Yet, the purposeful non-prevention of anything through
to everything, that has been one of the cornerstones of the corporate
structure's supposedly garnering the extinction of humanity (in order to
steal all it's stuff), at first a less obvious way of stealing tax $,
or at least funneling it through to rems and dinos, was practiced much
more insidiously than just that. You have countless examples, not just
politicians pathological lying to get their way (more), like Bush, Sr.,
saying before the election, "read my lips, no new taxes (tax increases)",
and directly after winning, raising people's taxes, there's S+L-gate (dems
getting $ 95,000 in pay-offs to 3 politicians supposedly stopping the
dems from prosecuting, or even holding the rems politically acccountable
for going on half a trillion $ theft of the taxpayer), October Surprise,
Iran/Contra-gate, the original computer start-up bubble then burst, Y2K,
Grenada unnecessary war (allowed by the dems, which set the precedent,
for, supposedly legitimizing, the rems future ones), etc.. So, even
though Gore 'got away with' not sending dems to counter the rem thuggees
stopping the recount of the vote in FL, and boyscout saluting the process
of dems demuring to rems, as a lesson to the people for not giving them
their projected 'have it like that' as the 'official' (and only,
according to the corporate structure's dictated duopolistic (deux party)
oligarchic plutocracy) opposition to the rems, he still can't be excused
from his vital role in losing the election he should have won to Bush, Jr..
Yet, you place Nader in the nadir of humanity's fall at the point of it's
needed resurrection? This while the RalphiNader did have a strategy that
was constructed to get dem votes, most of his supporters were struggling
to make sure that didn't interupt Gore's victory; specifically, and
especially, by universally getting out the vote, inspiring voters to vote,
and promoting the electoral processes that the supposed left, the
totalitarian/socialist conspiracy, was universally struggling against-
for, according to them, direct actions, demonstrations "were the only
way" of making real change possible (see how well those historic lies
worked in their 'anti-war' efforts?). Yet, as usual, the 'carrot and
stick' strategy that you must be in support of above, where the dems
don't win 'to teach the polity a lesson for next time', isn't even
mentioned above (in all probability); nor it's existence ever
acknowledged- why?... Cont'd in next comment:
Part 3a of 3b: That being said, Gore still won 1 million more votes
ReplyDeletethan Bush, jr.. Yet, that's not the most salient thing either, in our
country's fall to republicanism, which the tea party was just the
unnatural (ebony and ivory, the Black and white supremacies, machined it,
in perfect harmony, into existence to further divide, conquer, the people
and vampirize through to cannibalize the economy, tax $) progression of,
the next notsee step in the continual increasing of the speed of their
blitzkrieg of all life and the Earth. The reason would be the dems not
effectively countering the continual disenfranchisement of the people of
their vote, and rights there of. The biggest example is the flailing,
even now, counter-gerrymandering efforts of the dems; allowing that the
rems have the whole of the electoral processes gerryrigged against the
people and the dems- as well as, of course, the third party movement.
This, of course is the dems, tres facile, acquiescence to the
oligarchy's corporate structure's rule, through their spearhead, the
remocrat conspiracy, extinction and total destruction of the Earth, etc..
So, is it any wonder that the gerryrigging of the voting processes in FL
went unchallenged in a timely or meaningful way before the election; so,
the establishment of a list that purged voters that falsely said they
weren't allowed vote, numbering 95,000, mostly lower-middle-class to
poor people of color (who probably would vote dem, if they did)- I
think not? King george and his dick, cheney supposed won FL by 232
votes, and then the country, while Gore received a million more votes
than him; whereas we know republican thuggeeism and the Supremacy Court
installed him. Yet, the dems still are beating the third party processes
over the head for the corporate structure's convolution's devolutionary
direction's determining that every voter is devolved to one degree or
another; are replicants of the rich' decadence, avarice, narcissism,
nihilism, etc. (ask any poor person that doesn't even have two nickles
to rub together to start a dime, they'll tell you of their dreams,
special abilities, powers, vampirism, mutations, etc.)? Yes, the
conspiring of Jill Stein and the admin. of the Green Party to install
RumputiN/vlad-the-impaler into the Blackhouse (only a part of the global
invisible coup that did it, though), for they're socialists
and part of the totalitarian conspiracy for more, is a black eye, as
well as the most violent act against this country since the purposeful
non-prevention of the failing of the levees in NOLA by ebony and ivory,
the Black, white supremacies (who, in perfect harmony divided up the
federal funds they received for the reinforcing of the levees between
themselves), against the third party movement, but, just that, for
real greens are nonsocialist; ginos aren't actually greens because you
can't abide by the 'ten principles' of the Green Party and be a
socialist (as socialists dictate divide and conquer, materialism,
"there's no reality without their agreement" ('Chernobyl'), etc., non-
green motis operendi that are the same as the rems ones). And so too
they define power as on the scale of manipulation through to genocide
and extinction like the rems, and non-socialist real greens go in
the direction of not materialism, the evolution, instead of the
supposed garnering of ever increasing delusional profits, pleasures,
powers in ever increasingly cyclical and centralizing patterns of the
corporate structure's convolution.... Cont'd in next comment:
Part 3b of 3b: A fine example, destroying the
ReplyDeleteEarth, raping it's mountaintops, cannibalizing it to it's core, makes
supposedly increased delusional short term profits in the worldly
world while realizing long term real deficiits in reality that are
astronomically larger, the extinction of humanity and large mammals
as well as the probable total destruction of the Earth; while
incidental to the corporate structure's end all and be all, their
'bottom line', it should be the only thing that matters. Like the
supposed sciences ending humanity and the Earth in 400 years, that
it took the Cosmos, the evolution, 1 billion years to create, in
reality; like an instant destroying so much grace, "an insect, so
much grain" (Elton John). And yet that 'insect', the religion of
scientism, supposed science, is the nexus academic supremacy; how
can "...we(e),..." still allow this to unbe humanity? Needless
to say, Nader didn't do it, you really have to pick another
scapegoat. What we need to remember is that if you didn't vote
Hillary, you voted RumputiN/vlad-the-impaler be illegally
installed into the Blackhouse. Viva la evolucion. reality