Fact # 1, the extinction of humanity is seen on humanity's future's horizon, ergo, no time to allow mistakes; life's hour is late, accuracy can only be allowed to be shared widely. You say, "Mostly she is being dismissed as a will never win candidate anyway.", by whom, the corporate media, who ever cares or cared what they project for the corporate structure's convolution? "So the independent ticket isn’t as far fetched as you think.", this projection is based on the previous statements truth, which isn't; i.m.h.o.. Any independent ticket on the center-left would be the only excuse the corporate center-left would ever need for cowering through to caving to a trump illegal re-installation into the Blackhouse; therefore, no one can give them that (ergo processing a legitimization of the illegality of the extremist pathological lying Trump organized crime family and all it's crimes and conspirators, in a nutshell). "...The game is not really two party in my opinion, but the corporate rich against the rest, and the strategy of a rigged electoral system.", so, you're saying that since the duopoly has the power from the corporate rich, it's illegitimate, it's legitimacy is not relevant, as the time is short, hour's late for humanity; we must and can just do the best we can- and caving to the criminal insanity of the corporate structure by choosing some form of absentia is just partial insanity, yet, is enough to extinct humanity on it's own. You go on with, "No candidate will beat T by playing it safe.", there's a difference between "playing it safe" and abdicating to the republican conspiracy's insanity; no one running is playing it safe, taking your ball and going home is caving. "People want change. That’s why T was elected. He also knew how to dismiss and manipulate the RNC. He is a real change agent, but one with a wrecking ball.". NOT. People always want change in a dire situtation, and humanity's situation will only get more and more dire overtime; especially if we don't struggle as the life we were born to be. T wasn't elected because people wanted change, T was elected because an invisible coup illegally installed him in the Blackhouse: Hillary got going on 4 million more votes than he did, world intelligence communities informed our s that there were boatloads of cash coming from Ukraine and Russia to his campaign, the Russain Gov't, Assange, etc., wikileaks, etc., global hackers, etc., irresponsible social media, etc., our intelligence/ military/police industrial complexes, etc., all played an illegal and important part in that conspiracy- I find it odd that just becaude their extremely organized crime succeeded in installing him into the Blackhouse, you for some reason are calling that verification of the people's desire for change? T isn't "a real change agent", as you project, for, considering the history of humanity, how could anyone project that the most imperial, patriarchal, misogynist, misanthropic, etc., of candidates is a 'change agent"; unless death itself were to be considered a change agent as well- and only the malthusians think that. You continue with, "...But I don’t think the DNC will give her the time of day, nor is she up for manipulating them. I’m sure she’ll make the best decision she can. It was a serious question though.", All of this heaving and hawing, if you'll allow, is supposed to support your contention that commiting political suicide by extincting the human species, etc., through handing re-installation into the Blackhouse to RumputiN/vlad-the-impaler, isn't factual; for, there's nothing anyone could ever say that would slightly legitimize that- so, it's simply inconceivable that any candidate, including Bernie, would dare to run independently of the dems- and thereby hand a certain win to 'T'. reality
Fact # 1, the extinction of humanity is seen on humanity's future's horizon, ergo, no time to allow mistakes; life's hour is late, accuracy can only be allowed to be shared widely. You say, "Mostly she is being dismissed as a will never win candidate anyway.", by whom, the corporate media, who ever cares or cared what they project for the corporate structure's convolution? "So the independent ticket isn’t as far fetched as you think.", this projection is based on the previous statements truth, which isn't; i.m.h.o.. Any independent ticket on the center-left would be the only excuse the corporate center-left would ever need for cowering through to caving to a trump illegal re-installation into the Blackhouse; therefore, no one can give them that (ergo processing a legitimization of the illegality of the extremist pathological lying Trump organized crime family and all it's crimes and conspirators, in a nutshell). "...The game is not really two party in my opinion, but the corporate rich against the rest, and the strategy of a rigged electoral system.", so, you're saying that since the duopoly has the power from the corporate rich, it's illegitimate, it's legitimacy is not relevant, as the time is short, hour's late for humanity; we must and can just do the best we can- and caving to the criminal insanity of the corporate structure by choosing some form of absentia is just partial insanity, yet, is enough to extinct humanity on it's own. You go on with, "No candidate will beat T by playing it safe.", there's a difference between "playing it safe" and abdicating to the republican conspiracy's insanity; no one running is playing it safe, taking your ball and going home is caving. "People want change. That’s why T was elected. He also knew how to dismiss and manipulate the RNC. He is a real change agent, but one with a wrecking ball.". NOT. People always want change in a dire situtation, and humanity's situation will only get more and more dire overtime; especially if we don't struggle as the life we were born to be. T wasn't elected because people wanted change, T was elected because an invisible coup illegally installed him in the Blackhouse: Hillary got going on 4 million more votes than he did, world intelligence communities informed our s that there were boatloads of cash coming from Ukraine and Russia to his campaign, the Russain Gov't, Assange, etc., wikileaks, etc., global hackers, etc., irresponsible social media, etc., our intelligence/ military/police industrial complexes, etc., all played an illegal and important part in that conspiracy- I find it odd that just becaude their extremely organized crime succeeded in installing him into the Blackhouse, you for some reason are calling that verification of the people's desire for change? T isn't "a real change agent", as you project, for, considering the history of humanity, how could anyone project that the most imperial, patriarchal, misogynist, misanthropic, etc., of candidates is a 'change agent"; unless death itself were to be considered a change agent as well- and only the malthusians think that. You continue with, "...But I don’t think the DNC will give her the time of day, nor is she up for manipulating them. I’m sure she’ll make the best decision she can. It was a serious question though.", All of this heaving and hawing, if you'll allow, is supposed to support your contention that commiting political suicide by extincting the human species, etc., through handing re-installation into the Blackhouse to RumputiN/vlad-the-impaler, isn't factual; for, there's nothing anyone could ever say that would slightly legitimize that- so, it's simply inconceivable that any candidate, including Bernie, would dare to run independently of the dems- and thereby hand a certain win to 'T'. reality
ReplyDelete