Part 2 of 2: 3. Doesn't take into account the extinction as an organizing principle against the evolution, etc.. I wrote a twig of poetree in 2000, 'Exigency Or Humanity', which you can discern the relevance of by the title. To allow the appreciation of this one need not look farther than pop-art of the multi-media conspiracy, a Morgan Freeman movie, entitled 'Deep Impact' will do. A combination of Malthusian projections and the supposed need for military dictatorship as humanity hurls towards it's end tells it all; humanity let the global oligarchy dictate humanity was replaced by exigency, ending our human race before it even got going (humanity only unbeing the Earth's stillbirth, if you'll allow). As well, naively, only "the growth of human maturity", not it's devolutrionary trend, is looked at, discerned, mustn't we be real here and everywhere also? 4. More naivete, ignoring reality as marketing strategy, etc.? Yet, where is this "no separation", that you plainly resound? I would suggest it is nowhere. For, there's no separation and not no separation at once; to be accurate. Why is the path of study, the word separation, so important to study accurately; one might ask? If, for e.g., humanity continues to devolve to it's extinction and a few 100,000 years later there's no trace of our existence anywhere, won't it's delusions, etc., have been successfully separated from reality? Ah, now you're talking, what poetry, "the world of heart"; I hear you Brah. Do I really have to go there? A world, which suggests total separation from the actual world or reality; which contradicts most of what you've said? Those who grow in the evolution will experience it as truth, knowledge, yet, here I can't wait for this. As there's no use, no using and not no use and no using at once, we can discern many things that relate. A human-centric "world of heart" separate must exist because that's of use to you; using heart? Certainly, if there were something that couldn't be 'used' wouldn't it be heart? Obviously Native American wisdom, spiritual practice has much to teach, and you too can learn. Or is your "world of heart" hidden, and thereby separate? When I say this it's only because I experience it, all life are needed threads in the fabric of life, that "...we(e),..." can't allow to be torn asunder; no? You know, like "what God has brought together let no man tear asunder", etc.; creation is power, not destruction, etc.? As a mechanic in the building trades, carpentry, etc., I've experienced the reality of no separation betwixt what you call matter and life. It's very usable, words like Cosmos, Universe, etc., yet, separate from heart; why are parts of your anatomy, mindsets, perpsectives, consciousnesses, emotions, whatever you'd define as heart, superior to the Cosmos, having their own world, while you also say intrinsic to the Cosmos, etc.? That's a good start here. 7. Demands far more work than you've done so far. How "we" develop our collective skills to gift; in some separate community, in some secluded forest, on some peak near Everest, sacred site? Or, rather everywhere with everyone, now, the evolution? 8. Yes, it does, yet, those also include all the ones you aren't aware of, didn't intend, etc., as those causes that you weren't accurate about realize effects that you chose to not foresee; many of which are opposite of your quixotic, while real enough intent- no? 9. One can't struggle with 'la machine' successfully without being of deft consciousness, parameters incomprehensible, paradigms non-existent; life can be taught to those who also have beginner's mind, room in their cup and the curiosity to choose an empty boat, for example- no? Viva la evolucion :) reality
Part 2 of 2: 3. Doesn't take into account the extinction as an organizing principle against the evolution, etc.. I wrote a twig of poetree in 2000, 'Exigency Or Humanity', which you can discern the relevance of by the title. To allow the appreciation of this one need not look farther than pop-art of the multi-media conspiracy, a Morgan Freeman movie, entitled 'Deep Impact' will do. A combination of Malthusian projections and the supposed need for military dictatorship as humanity hurls towards it's end tells it all; humanity let the global oligarchy dictate humanity was replaced by exigency, ending our human race before it even got going (humanity only unbeing the Earth's stillbirth, if you'll allow). As well, naively, only "the growth of human maturity", not it's devolutrionary trend, is looked at, discerned, mustn't we be real here and everywhere also? 4. More naivete, ignoring reality as marketing strategy, etc.? Yet, where is this "no separation", that you plainly resound? I would suggest it is nowhere. For, there's no separation and not no separation at once; to be accurate. Why is the path of study, the word separation, so important to study accurately; one might ask? If, for e.g., humanity continues to devolve to it's extinction and a few 100,000 years later there's no trace of our existence anywhere, won't it's delusions, etc., have been successfully separated from reality? Ah, now you're talking, what poetry, "the world of heart"; I hear you Brah. Do I really have to go there? A world, which suggests total separation from the actual world or reality; which contradicts most of what you've said? Those who grow in the evolution will experience it as truth, knowledge, yet, here I can't wait for this. As there's no use, no using and not no use and no using at once, we can discern many things that relate. A human-centric "world of heart" separate must exist because that's of use to you; using heart? Certainly, if there were something that couldn't be 'used' wouldn't it be heart? Obviously Native American wisdom, spiritual practice has much to teach, and you too can learn. Or is your "world of heart" hidden, and thereby separate? When I say this it's only because I experience it, all life are needed threads in the fabric of life, that "...we(e),..." can't allow to be torn asunder; no? You know, like "what God has brought together let no man tear asunder", etc.; creation is power, not destruction, etc.? As a mechanic in the building trades, carpentry, etc., I've experienced the reality of no separation betwixt what you call matter and life. It's very usable, words like Cosmos, Universe, etc., yet, separate from heart; why are parts of your anatomy, mindsets, perpsectives, consciousnesses, emotions, whatever you'd define as heart, superior to the Cosmos, having their own world, while you also say intrinsic to the Cosmos, etc.? That's a good start here. 7. Demands far more work than you've done so far. How "we" develop our collective skills to gift; in some separate community, in some secluded forest, on some peak near Everest, sacred site? Or, rather everywhere with everyone, now, the evolution? 8. Yes, it does, yet, those also include all the ones you aren't aware of, didn't intend, etc., as those causes that you weren't accurate about realize effects that you chose to not foresee; many of which are opposite of your quixotic, while real enough intent- no? 9. One can't struggle with 'la machine' successfully without being of deft consciousness, parameters incomprehensible, paradigms non-existent; life can be taught to those who also have beginner's mind, room in their cup and the curiosity to choose an empty boat, for example- no? Viva la evolucion :) reality
ReplyDelete